A History of Violence | Film review (2024)

There's just one thing to tip you off that this is a film by David Cronenberg. The gunshot wounds. In an otherwise straight-looking, straight-talking movie, they stand out like lush and evil-smelling exotic flowers. Now obviously, getting shot in the face can't look pretty. But surely to God it doesn't look like this. The ghastly contusions and lesions where the bullet goes in gibber like some extra rubbery mandible, or like the face of the Alien as it emerges from John Hurt's stomach. These cannot appear in any medical textbook known to man. It is as if the wounded person has been suddenly whisked at warp-speed to Planet Cronenberg to have the injury seeded with a kinky bacterium and then transported back to Earth for the resulting metastasis to be filmed.

Otherwise it's all quite normal. Sort of. Cronenberg has here directed an adaptation of a graphic novel by John Wagner and Vince Locke - part of a publishing series which includes The Road to Perdition, recently shot by Sam Mendes - although this has a cleaner, more uncluttered design, is more relaxed and less obviously concerned to transmit the super-cool novelty of its comic-book origins. It is a rather gripping and stylish film, a kind of black serio-comedy. A little middle-of-the-road for Cronenberg, maybe, but for him this has turned out to be the fast lane.

A History of Violence is about the intrusion of violent and bizarre outsiders in a peaceful all-American small town whose inhabitants' lives are drawn with surprising wit and sympathy. It looks like Frank Capra, and Main Street resembles the one in Phoenix, Arizona, where the real estate office is to be found in Psycho. Viggo Mortensen plays Tom: a rugged, regular guy whose handsome features are always on the point of being shyly drawn upwards into a "Shucks". He runs a modest little diner, working behind the counter in an apron, serving coffee and slices of generic pie, exchanging badinage with his employees: a place where people say "See you in church!" without getting a laugh. Tom has a bright, nervy son, Jack (Ashton Holmes) who is being pushed around by a jock bully in school, a sweet pre-teen daughter and a wife, Edie (Maria Bello) who, after 15 years of marriage, still loves and desires him - enough to dress up as a fantasy cheerleader for some raunchy intra-marital soixante-neuf. One of the interesting achievements of this film is to argue for the intensity, even violence, possible in married love.

Everyone's lives change when some itinerant bad guys roll into town and make the serious mistake of trying to stick up the local diner - and indeed mess with the womenfolk. Quiet Tom re-enacts the final verse of The Coward of the County, and to his embarrassment finds himself feted by the national media as an American smalltown hero: the man who disarmed two criminals and showed them some rough justice. Tom finds that his celebrity has attracted the attention of some very scary individuals. A big-city wiseguy played by Ed Harris - sporting a spectacularly yucky Cronenberg-wound on his face - shows up, and Tom's moment of heroism unlocks some secrets in his past and draws him and his family into a terrifying world of violence.

Cronenberg is not known for subtlety exactly, and this is hardly a subtle film, but there is something intriguing and understated in the way he contrives a syncopation of narrative and character. It looks on paper like a regular father-son drama, or a standard-issue gangster film, but there's a Twilight Zoney offness and weirdness. The explicit alienness of films like Crash or Dead Ringers or eXistenZ has been coiled and hidden in the movie's fabric. He gets an unreality effect, a note of superhero or secret-identity fantasy, that works particularly well when Tom's teenage boy suddenly finds in himself the capacity for aggression necessary to stand up to his tormentors at school. On the strength of this, Cronenberg might well find himself offered the next Spider-Man movie.

The director saves his best flourish for his final act: a terrifically funny performance from William Hurt as the glowering gangster who finally confronts Tom. He is living a life of preposterous self-importance in the pseudo-baronial stately home that he considers commensurate with a vicious killer of his standing. Hurt's habitual puzzled, quizzical, faintly nettled look - a regular feature of his performances since the days of Broadcast News - has at last come into its own as a kind of murderous grumpiness. His presence provides the movie with an uproarious finale - which, however, might not be enough to satisfy some people, inside and outside the director's fanbase, who will complain Cronenberg has allowed himself to be washed into the commercial mainstream. This isn't true. He has dammed and diverted the mainstream and made it work for him.

A History of Violence | Film review (2024)

FAQs

Is A History of Violence worth watching? ›

A fully realized, wholly rendered, singular work of art. Fresh score. This story could easily have fallen into Quentin Tarantino pop-violence territory, but Cronenberg, with tremendous skill, manages to use Hollywood cliché to pose questions about the world in which we live. Fresh score.

What is the story of A History of Violence summary? ›

What is the twist in A History of Violence? ›

[Spoiler Warning] In a disturbing twist, Tom's brother, Richie, who happens to be part of a major crime syndicate, orders one of his goons to kill his brother by strangling him. Instead, Tom kills the man and one other guard with his bare hands by breaking their necks.

Why did Joey Cusack leave? ›

Tom shocks Edie by admitting that he is actually Joey Cusack, and that he has killed for both money and pleasure. He tells Edie that he ran away from Philadelphia to escape his violent criminal past. This admission deepens the tensions in their marriage.

Is A History of Violence gory? ›

It had some violent scenes that are bloody and will keep you on a big impact. Viggo Mortensen plays an diner owner, Tom Stall, who lives with his wife and kids in the small town of Millbrook, Indiana. One night, two robbers attempt to rob the restaurant but Tom saves the day by killing them in self-defense.

Why is History of violence rated R? ›

The violence in this movie is quite graphic yet frightening; two men rob a diner and forces the man to give them money or his partner will forcefully try to rape one of his waitresses. The man knocks the robber over in the floor, and shoots him on the top of his head, and blood is seen gushing from his mouth.

Does Tom Stall have multiple personality disorder? ›

Does Tom suffer from MPD? Because at times, he looks and sounds like he really believes his own lies when he vehemently denies being the person Joey Cusack. No, not really. When Tom is talking to Edie after he admits to being Joey Cusack, she asks him whether he has Multiple Personality Disorder.

Is the movie History of violence based on a true story? ›

No, A History of Violence is not based on a true story. It is a work of fiction adapted from the graphic novel of the same name by John Wagner and Vince Locke.

Where did they film the history of violence? ›

David Cronenberg's acclaimed film A History of Violence takes place in the fictional town of Millbrook, Indiana, but was filmed in Millbrook, Ontario.

Does History of Violence have a happy ending? ›

Eventually, Tom ends up back in Philly, where he has a final showdown with his brother Richie (Hurt) where he kills everyone that knows his name. The film ends with him back in Indiana. His secret is safe in this town, but the people who thought they knew him have changed their opinions.

Is Leo a remake of History of Violence? ›

Ranjani Krishnakumar of Hindustan Times wrote "Vijay's performance in emotional scenes evokes no reactions even as Lokesh Kanagaraj provides ample electrifying action scenes." Internationally, Simon Abrams of RogerEbert.com stated Leo is a formulaic but satisfying Indian remake of A History of Violence.

Is A History of Violence based on a comic book? ›

Gunn also singled out David Cronenberg's “A History of Violence,” which was adapted from Josh Wagner and Vince Locke's graphic novel, as an example of what is possible in the comic book genre.

Why is history of violence good? ›

It's predictably unpredictable, if you will. Very well written and acted, thought provoking examination of the duality of human beings- how good people can remain good while being capable of extreme violence under the right circ*mstances. Also a great redemption story about a bad guy turned good. Highly recommended!

What is the meaning of history of violence? ›

to have a history of violence: to have previously committed aggressive or violent acts, to have been violent in the past idiom.

What is the theme of the history of violence? ›

A History of Violence explores themes of identity and the cycle of violence. It shows how a man's inability to escape his past destroys everything he has in the present.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Kieth Sipes

Last Updated:

Views: 5893

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kieth Sipes

Birthday: 2001-04-14

Address: Suite 492 62479 Champlin Loop, South Catrice, MS 57271

Phone: +9663362133320

Job: District Sales Analyst

Hobby: Digital arts, Dance, Ghost hunting, Worldbuilding, Kayaking, Table tennis, 3D printing

Introduction: My name is Kieth Sipes, I am a zany, rich, courageous, powerful, faithful, jolly, excited person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.